Hello,

Here’s some thoughts on software for August.

Bear with me on these broad categories but I think you can group most software projects into one of these groups: art, infrastructure, and activism.

Art is primarily to communicate experiences and feelings to others. Making video games is art. Making digital musical and instruments and visual effects is art. The drawing you did as a child that’s stuck on somebody’s fridge is art. The 3rd year computing student’s university coursework, uploaded to Github without comment and abandoned forever… that’s art, or at least, it’s a sketchbook. The thorny entry to the IOCCC, the optimized inner loop deep in some graphics toolkit, that only a handful of people will ever look at, but all of them will agree: that’s art.

People make art for fun, learning and practice.

Infrastructure is stuff that is needed and expected for the world to function. The definition of infrastructure changes over time, as societies adopt and depend on new technologies. Roads, milk delivery, electricity, bakeries, aqueducts, supermarkets, the internet, trams, the lift in your apartment building, and so on. Many societies depend on software projects now. Web browsers, phone cells, operating systems, social networks, software developer tools, power grid management, Google Maps, and so on.

People make infrastructure for money, or perhaps out of a sense of duty.

Activism is a desire to bring about a particular social or political goal or change. I don’t know when the first activist software project started, but it was no later than the 1980s when the GNU project began its stated mission to make proprietary software unviable via copyleft, and many free software projects followed along. The design of the GNU C compiler was shaped by the mission. Tor began in the 2000s with the goal of ensuring private, uncensored internet access. Bitcoin began with the stated aim of destroying the financial system, the wake of the 2008 bank crisis. Although in many countries it’s now regulated financial infrastructure, which shows you that projects can move between these categories over time.

People spend our energy on activism based on our beliefs, usually a sense of wanting to make the world a better place for everyone, or at least for ourselves, and our friends and family.

Not everything fits into these categories (the biggest gap I can see is experiments and research) but let’s keep this short, I want to use them to look at the conversations I keep seeing in the open source world this year.

When one person sees a project as activism and another sees it as infrastructure, you see some genuinely confused conversations happening.

Codeberg banned projects with largely AI generated code from the site, and Sourcehut is considering doing the same. If you see these projects as Git hosting infrastructure similar to Gitlab and Github, then that decision makes very little sense. Why would they want to host fewer projects? However if you see the project as a group of activists trying to reduce the power and influence of US tech firms, and limit the harms of rapid of adoption of AI, then it makes a lot of sense.

Linux decided to allow some LLM use and not put too many limits, as long as its making the project better. If you see Linux as a bunch of engineers building infrastructure then it’s a very logical decision. But if you thought your contributions were part of some activist movement then that might be a disappointing decision.

Every so often I hear someone say things like “please keep politics out of software”. You can infer that they’re probably talking about infrastructure software — and it’s as misguided as if they said it about any other infrastructure. Is an aqueduct political? If one country is seen as stealing another country’s water then… yes. Can a shipping lane be political? Yes, see numerous examples, including the ongoing US-Iran conflict. Can a road be political? Yes, if it crosses a border, especially if it’s in dispute. Ask someone old from Berlin or the north of Ireland about whether roads can be political.

Maintaining software takes a lot of effort. If someone is putting in that effort without being paid, they have some other motivation for doing it. Humans rarely do difficult, laborious work for no reason. Our motivation might be to learn, to show off, to have fun, to meet people, to collaborate with friends, or it might be to work towards some kind of political or societal change. I’ve probably contributed to open source for all of these reasons at different times.

We are increasingly referring to open source software as “digital infrastructure” and funding some of the maintenance work via corporate money and public money. This is great, but it requires the project to frame itself as infrastructure rather than activism. You are unlikely to get funding from Microsoft if you openly state that your goal is to destroy Microsoft. You are unlikely to get funding from a government if your stated goal is to destroy the modern financial system or prevent all forms of censorship.

Activists using open source licenses have something of a problem to deal with. If your goal is to bring about world peace, you hardly want people building drones and missiles using the software you develop. Yet the open source movement have made it clear that if you try to limit who can use your software, it’s no longer open source. And, many software engineers have made it clear they don’t give a shit about software licensing anyway and they’ll use your code however they want without even reading the license.

You can control access to software infrastructure, of course, just like you can put soldiers and passport controls on a bridge or a road. But you can’t call it open source any more.

The GNOME desktop project is art, infrastructure and activism. The discussion on Reddit is mostly people who design and post desktops and themes for fun. Several corporations build products with GNOME, and treat it as infrastructure. And then there are contributors who want to bring about change, perhaps weakening the power of Big Tech by spreading an ethical alternative to Android and iOS.

GNOME hasn’t made a statement on AI use, and I don’t think we’ve tried very hard to discuss it so far. I wonder if we’re putting it off because we’d have to also discuss whether our goal is to maintain some infrastructure, or build something cool-looking, or bring about meaningful societal change?

Over the summer of 2026, I worked towards bringing the option of playing Vocab-Style puzzles to GNOME Crosswords as part of Google Summer of Code. This entailed adding support to the puzzle library, and writing the backend of the algorithm responsible for grid generation. Jonathan Blandford provides a thorough rundown on the ins and outs of Crosswords with these slides.

The first few weeks of the start of GSoC were spent by adding a drop-down calendar widget to Crosswords Editor, and storing GDate data as ISO8601. We decided to integrate this into my design despite it not being directly related to the proposed project because it still contributed to the Crosswords app.

For the new puzzle type, I started with adding support to the puzzle library, libipuz, which is responsible for formatting and representing puzzles styled as ‘paper-and-pencil’ crosswords. My primary mentor and I bounced ideas back and forth for some time before we started designing and writing the algorithm. We landed on an idea and I created an initial design document for the plan of action to follow for the summer. We decided that aiming for both the backend and frontend in one summer may be more work than we initially thought, so we concluded on focusing exclusively on getting a working algorithm to build from.

The bulk of this summer consisted of writing and reconfiguring the depth-first search backtracking algorithm.

 

GitLab Links to Code:

An overview of my GitLab profile can be found here.

• Implementation of New Vocab Puzzles
  • This is the bulk of the algorithm and unit tests. The user inputs a word, the word gets analyzed in a recursive function to check for crossings and constraints, we save the state of the board, backtrack if needed, and present a grid.
• Vocab Ipuz
  • Adding new class for IpuzVocab to support vocab puzzles in the puzzle library (libipuz).
• Check for Island Words
  • There may be a word in a list that may not share any intersection points with any others no matter how many backtracks are done. Consequently, this affects grid creation in a timely manner and may prevent grid generation at all by stating it false. We can compare the bitmask of words in the list before we even activate the algorithm to detect a word that would potentially conflict with the others.

• Date Validation
  • Previously, the Crosswords Editor had a free-for-all AdwEntryRow. However its purpose is to present a legible date to the user, and store the date in ISO8601 format. I used GDateTime, GDate, and a Gtk Calendar widget to add a drop-down calendar in the date box. The chosen date presented in Gregorian style to the user, and stored as ISO8601 to the backend.
• Added Dispose to Shapebg
  • Releases references to GObjects that Shapebg owns and frees Shapebg’s remaining memory.

 

Design Docs:

• Updated Design Doc
•  Vocab Design Doc

 

Blog Post Links (Most Recent -> Oldest):

• GSoC 2026 Final Report – Laureen Caliman
• Vocab-style Crosswords Update | Final Stretch
• Intern Experience at GUADEC
• Update on Crosswords Backtracking Algorithm
• Pick a Word, Any Word
• Extending Libipuz
• GSoC Project Start
• Introduction Post

 

I also gave a lightning talk at the 2026 GNOME Users and Developers European Conference here. Thank you to the GNOME Travel Committee for making that opportunity possible.

I still have some work to do for both Libipuz and Crosswords: finish the island-checking function detailed above, open a new MR to choose the most compact/square grid out of 500 options and present that to the user directly rather than them cherry-pick through a large selection,  create a new MR to add photos of the puzzle in libipuz using gi-docgen, convert the 500-generated grid code to a PuzzleTask, and incorporate the frontend to make this a fully-functioning part of the game.

I would like to thank my primary mentor, Jonathan Blandford, and my other mentor, Federico Mena Quintero, for their guidance, feedback, patience, and teaching. This program was exactly what I needed to become better at development and serves as my rock to open-source contributions. I learned a lot of valuable skills such as document reading, how much to push in a commit, how to slow down trying to get a lot done at once, but simultaneously how to speed up my progression on the parts that actually matter, code with brevity, and a whole lot of dealing with nasty version control!

I intend to continue contributing to GNOME Crosswords as well as the overall GNOME Foundation. I look forward to collaborating with more people involved in the Foundation!